Well you'd think people would use their brains a bit more.
Ok so I am for one am to claiming that Bradley Mannings case is clear cut some are though.

Especially on the charge of handing information to the enemy. Wikileaks is the enemy? Which is pretty much public information is the enemy. However it can get to the hands of terrorists but I question the validity of this statement without analysis of the situation. Take for example the media's extraordinary assumptions made which pretty much tells everyone what to think and what information is available to the internet. Now I think this is much worse than Wikileaks. 

The cables show possible civilian targets including NovoNordisk in Denmark (which I think is bad), but also lists civilians who could be potential targets namely those who were friendly in Afghanistan.

I honestly believe that America Identifying a Foreign Civilian Medical Company namely that related to diabetes medication is dangerous and it is without doubt America's fault for putting it on their national threat list and also it is the fault of the media for highlighting this. 

I knew what I was looking for namely this information and it is damn near impossible to find unless you look for it specifically. I don't particularly think this information is not already in the public domain in respects to the infrastructure elements. Though I find it hard to believe that some idiot terrorist could find this information and use it. They didn't need it in the first place to attack airports and I don't think they are smart enough to do the data analysis. Flying and hacking are two different things. 

Then to be asked rhetorically "You don't think he gave information to the enemy hehehe" in a condescending manner, Well no I don't, "But its on the internet everyone can get it", I don't think they're intelligent enough. "They flew planes into the trade center" I reiterate my last point, it doesn't mean they can analyse that data. "One man can hack into the department of defense with a normal computer." Well then what does it matter that its on wikileaks.

"He gave information to the enemy" Well thats not what the courts said which is what you were talking about in the first place. So evidently not then.

It's not black and white, and Al Qaeda are still a bunch of religious idiots.

"But Bin Laden had a degree!" maybe so but what was it in poltical science or civil engineering? That no one is sure if he completed or which one he did and everyone seems certain he was quite religious and studied relgious books more than the subjects. Well I can see how that helps with hacking..... o no wait a minute i think thats the other way round I can't see how that helps with hacking yes that makes more sense since he was a class A idiot.  

All religious fanatics are idiots otherwise they wouldn't be religious fanatics.